share_log

CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 75% of the Company

CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 75% of the Company

納斯達克上的CSX公司受到持有公司75%股權的機構投資者的青睞。
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 19:12

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies CSX's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持股比例高意味着CSX的股票價格受到他們交易行爲的影響。
  • 共有25家投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,達到49%的持股比例。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

If you want to know who really controls CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着CSX公司(NASDAQ:CSX),那麼你得看看它的股份登記簿構成。我們可以看到機構持有這家公司的絕大部分股份,持股比例爲75%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲得最大收益(或者如果股票出現了一次下跌,該群體將遭受最大損失)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CSX.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了CSX的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CSX Ownership Breakdown June 6th 2024
納斯達克CSX所有權分佈圖(2024年6月6日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CSX?

機構持股告訴我們關於CSX的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

CSX already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CSX, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

CSX的股份登記簿已經有了機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這表明一些專業投資者對該公司有信譽。但不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果有兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一支股票,通常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查一下CSX的過去收入軌跡(如下圖)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CSX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 6th 2024
納斯達克CSX收入和營業收入增長圖(2024年6月6日)

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. CSX is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.2% and 4.9% of the stock.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的發行股份,董事會可能會注意他們的喜好。CSX不是由對沖基金所有。先鋒集團是目前最大的股東,持有9.0%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.2%和4.9%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of CSX

CSX的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that CSX Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$98m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,CSX的內部人員擁有不到1%的公司股份。由於規模如此之大,我們不希望內部人員擁有大量的股票。總的來說,他們擁有9800萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但最好檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在購買股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in CSX. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般大衆(通常是個人投資者)持有CSX的25%的股份。雖然這一持股比例相當可觀,但如果公司決策與其他大股東不一致,可能還不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for CSX you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們已經發現CSX的一個警告跡象,你需要注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論