share_log

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有80%股權的rli保險(紐交所: RLI)嚴重受機構所有者控制。
Simply Wall St ·  06/04 18:38

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies RLI's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

  • 機構持股份額顯著高,意味着RLI的股票價格對其交易行爲的敏感性很高。

  • 總共13位投資者持有該公司51%的股份,成爲其大股東。

  • 持股研究以及分析師的預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會。

If you want to know who really controls RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry.  The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions.   That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着RLI Corp.(NYSE:RLI),那麼您需要查看其股份註冊表的構成。持有公司股票數量最多的群體,準確來說約佔80%,便是機構。即,如果該股票上漲(或出現下行趨勢),該群體將從中獲得最大的利益(或遭受最大的損失)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors.  Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.  

由於機構擁有巨額資本,因此他們的市場行動往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,公司中有大量機構資金投資往往被視爲一個有吸引力的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RLI.

下面的圖表詳細介紹了RLI的不同所有權群體。

NYSE:RLI Ownership Breakdown June 4th 2024

NYSE:RLI所有權細分2024年6月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RLI?

機構持股對RLI有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that RLI does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock.  This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does.  When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RLI's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,RLI確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股份。這表明專業投資者中存在一定的信任度。但我們不能僅指望這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方面可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以看到RLI的歷史收益和營業收入,在了解更多信息的同時,還需探究不同角度的觀點。

NYSE:RLI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 4th 2024

NYSE:RLI收益和營收增長2024年6月4日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences.    RLI is not owned by hedge funds.      The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.9% of shares outstanding.        Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.6% and 7.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.  

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股份,因此董事會可能會關注他們的偏好。RLI不屬於對沖基金持有。The Vanguard Group, Inc.現在是公司最大的股東,持有9.9%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的9.6%和7.8%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.  

在進行更多調查後,我們發現前13名機構擁有該公司51%的綜合所有權,這表明沒有單一股東對該公司具有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance.   Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.  

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一種好的做法,以深入了解公司股票的預期表現。相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以輕鬆地分析預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of RLI

RLI的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count.  Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計算在內。公司管理負責運營業務,但CEO即使是成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in RLI Corp..   The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$255m. Most would see this as a real positive.  It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.  

我們可以報告,內部人員確實擁有RLI Corp的股份。內部人員持有的股份價值達到2.55億美元,大多數人會認爲這是一件真正的好事。看到內部人員的這種投資水平令人鼓舞。您可以在此處檢查這些內部人員最近是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RLI.   While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常情況下,個人投資者持有16%的RLI股份。雖然佔股份的比例可能不足以在企業政策制定方面發揮重大影響,但他們仍然可以對企業政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.    To that end, you should learn about the   2 warning signs we've spotted with RLI (including 1 which is concerning) .  

儘管考慮到公司的不同所有權群體的確很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。因此,您應該了解RLI的2項警告信號(其中1項令人擔憂)其他風險因素。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論