share_log

With 52% Ownership of the Shares, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (NYSE:PAGS) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 52% Ownership of the Shares, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (NYSE:PAGS) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

pagseguro digital有限公司(NYSE: PAGS)的股份擁有者以機構投資者為主,佔股比達52%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/05 18:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies PagSeguro Digital's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構投資者持股比例顯著高,意味着PagSeguro Digital的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前3大股東持有50%的業務。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

Every investor in PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (NYSE:PAGS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

持有PagSeguro Digital Ltd.(紐交所:PAGS)股票的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。 我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的絕大部分股權,佔有52%的所有權。 換句話說,該機構在對該公司的投資中將獲得(或失去)最多的利益。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of PagSeguro Digital, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究PagSeguro Digital的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:PAGS Ownership Breakdown June 5th 2024
紐交所:PAGS所有權結構圖(2024年6月5日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PagSeguro Digital?

機構投資者持股告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

PagSeguro Digital already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at PagSeguro Digital's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

PagSeguro Digital已經有機構投資者在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過股票並對其表示認可。 但是,他們可能和其他人一樣是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,股價可能會快速下跌。因此,值得看一下PagSeguro Digital下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:PAGS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 5th 2024
紐交所:PAGS收益和營業收入增長圖(2024年6月5日)

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. PagSeguro Digital is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Folha-UOL SA with 38% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are FMR LLC and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.2%.

投資者應注意,實際上機構持有超過一半的公司股份,因此可以集體行使重要的權力。 PagSeguro Digital不是由對沖基金擁有。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到Folha-UOL SA是最大的股東,佔股38%。 第二和第三大股東是FMR LLC和BlackRock,Inc.,其持有相同數量的股份爲6.2%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.

股東登記表的更詳細研究顯示,前3大股東通過其50%的股份擁有相當大的公司所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of PagSeguro Digital

PagSeguro Digital的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們的數據無法確認董事會成員個人持有股份。由於我們不能獲悉內部持股情況,因此可能存在缺失數據。因此,評估首席執行官的報酬和任期很有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有公司的10%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在其方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 38%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司38%的股份。私營公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人可能通過持有私營公司而非以個人身份擁有公共公司的利益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但這是值得進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with PagSeguro Digital .

我認爲查看公司所有者是非常有趣的事情。但是,爲了真正獲得見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們觀察到的PagSeguro Digital的1個警示標誌。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論