share_log

Kemper Corporation (NYSE:KMPR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 82% of the Company

Kemper Corporation (NYSE:KMPR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 82% of the Company

kemper公司(紐交所:KMPR)受到持有該公司82%股份的機構投資者的青睞。
Simply Wall St ·  06/03 18:06

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Kemper implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 12 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 機構對Kemper公司的實質持股意味着他們在公司股價上擁有重要影響力。
  • 前12名股東持有該公司51%的股份。
  • 最近有內部人員購買。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Kemper Corporation (NYSE:KMPR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

想要了解Kemper Corporation(NYSE:KMPR)真正的掌控者,了解業務的所有權結構是非常重要的。持有公司股份最多的群體是機構,精確到約82%,換句話說,該團體最有可能從其對該公司的投資中獲益最多(或者蒙受最大損失)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Kemper.

下圖是Kemper的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:KMPR Ownership Breakdown June 3rd 2024
NYSE:KMPR所有權結構於2024年6月3日細分。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kemper?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Kemper的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Kemper. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kemper's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Kemper中佔有相當大的股份。這表明職業投資者中存在一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,有時會出現風險。當這樣一筆交易出現問題時,多個股東可能會競相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Kemper的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,這個故事只有更多的內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:KMPR Earnings and Revenue Growth June 3rd 2024
NYSE:2024年6月3日的KMPR收益和營業收入增長。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Kemper is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.2% of shares outstanding. With 8.0% and 7.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注其偏好。Kemper不是由對沖基金擁有的。從我們的數據中可以看出,最大股東是The Vanguard Group,擁有9.2%的流通股。Fuller&Thaler Asset Management,Inc.則是第二大股東,其持有流通股的8.0%,而BlackRock,Inc.則是第三大股東,其持有流通股的7.0%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

考慮到前12名股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Kemper

Kemper內部人員的持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Kemper Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$179m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人員持有Kemper股票的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,所以看到一些潛在的重要股東持有該股票通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約爲1.79億美元的股票(按當前的價格計算)。如果您想探索內部自查的問題,可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Kemper. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有13%股份的公衆,主要包括個人投資者,對Kemper具有一定的影響力。雖然該組織無法必然掌控公司,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生實際的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Kemper you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體很有價值,但是還有其他更重要的因素。考慮風險,例如。每個公司都有風險,而我們已經爲Kemper發現了1個警告信號,您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論