share_log

Great Week for InMode Ltd. (NASDAQ:INMD) Institutional Investors After Losing 44% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for InMode Ltd. (NASDAQ:INMD) Institutional Investors After Losing 44% Over the Previous Year

inmode ltd(納斯達克:INMD)機構投資者上週表現優秀,此前一年跌幅44%
Simply Wall St ·  06/03 18:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies InMode's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 49% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持有的股份高顯著表明InMode的股價對其交易行爲極其敏感。
  • 前25名股東持有49%的業務。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

Every investor in InMode Ltd. (NASDAQ:INMD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 67% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

納斯達克股票代碼(INMD)公司InMode Ltd.的每位投資者都應該了解股東中最強大的股東群體。擁有該公司最多股份的集團,準確地說,約佔66.7%,是機構。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 3.5% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 44%.

機構投資者欣賞上週股價上漲3.5%,因爲他們一年的損失總額已達44%令人失望。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of InMode.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了InMode的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:INMD Ownership Breakdown June 3rd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼(INMD)所有權拆分2024年6月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About InMode?

機構所有權告訴我們關於InMode的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in InMode. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at InMode's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所見,機構投資者在InMode中擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好要警惕依賴機構投資者所謂驗證的做法。他們也犯錯誤。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得一看的是下面InMode的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:INMD Earnings and Revenue Growth June 3rd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼(INMD)收入和收入增長2024年6月3日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in InMode. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.0% and 3.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Michael Kreindel, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. In addition, we found that Moshe Mizrahy, the CEO has 2.4% of the shares allocated to their name.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能會注意到他們的偏好。對於InMode來說,對沖基金沒有太多股份。BlackRock,Inc.目前是公司的最大股東,佔已發行股份的7.4%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的4.0%和3.7%。第三大股東Michael Kreindel還兼任董事會成員。此外,我們還發現首席執行官Moshe Mizrahy將2.4%的股份分配給自己的名字。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of InMode

InMode的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in InMode Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$157m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告內部人員持有InMode Ltd.的股份。這是一家相當大型的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重要股東持有這些股份通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們持有大約價值1.57億美元的股份(以當前價格計算)。大多數人會表示,這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性。但仍然值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在交易。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in InMode. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常爲個人投資者的公衆持有InMode的23%股份。雖然這種業務規模可能不足以在他們的利益中影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand InMode better, we need to consider many other factors.

始終考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體是值得的。但要更好地了解InMode,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡檢查營收增長的歷史記錄。您也可以通過查看這個詳細的圖表中歷史營收和收益的免費圖表來了解。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論