share_log

Is Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL) Using Too Much Debt?

Seadrill(紐約證券交易所代碼:SDRL)是否使用過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  05/28 18:47

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Seadrill Limited (NYSE:SDRL) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

傳奇基金經理李露(由查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:“最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。”因此,很明顯,當你考慮任何給定股票的風險時,你需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務會使公司陷入困境。與許多其他公司一樣,Seadrill Limited(紐約證券交易所代碼:SDRL)也使用債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司面臨風險。

When Is Debt A Problem?

債務何時會成爲問題?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務爲企業提供幫助,直到企業難以用新的資本或自由現金流還清債務。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制業務。但是,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,以支撐其資產負債表。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理債務,而且對自己有利。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,要做的第一件事是將其現金和債務放在一起考慮。

What Is Seadrill's Net Debt?

Seadrill 的淨負債是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2024 Seadrill had debt of US$609.0m, up from US$358.0m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$584.0m, its net debt is less, at about US$25.0m.

您可以點擊下圖查看更多詳情,該圖片顯示,截至2024年3月,Seadrill的債務爲6.090億美元,高於一年的3.58億美元。但是,由於其現金儲備爲5.84億美元,其淨負債較少,約爲2500萬美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:SDRL Debt to Equity History May 28th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SDRL 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 5 月 28 日

A Look At Seadrill's Liabilities

看看 Seadrill 的負債

The latest balance sheet data shows that Seadrill had liabilities of US$355.0m due within a year, and liabilities of US$840.0m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$584.0m and US$211.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$400.0m.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Seadrill的負債爲3.55億美元,之後到期的負債爲8.40億美元。另一方面,它有一年內到期的現金爲5.84億美元,還有價值2.11億美元的應收賬款。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額4億美元。

Of course, Seadrill has a market capitalization of US$3.53b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward. But either way, Seadrill has virtually no net debt, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

當然,Seadrill的市值爲35.3億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以控制的。但是,有足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東今後繼續監督資產負債表。但是無論哪種方式,Seadrill幾乎沒有淨負債,因此可以公平地說,它沒有沉重的債務負擔!

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力:將其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這樣,我們既考慮債務的絕對數量,也考慮爲債務支付的利率。

With debt at a measly 0.047 times EBITDA and EBIT covering interest a whopping 16.1 times, it's clear that Seadrill is not a desperate borrower. Indeed relative to its earnings its debt load seems light as a feather. Better yet, Seadrill grew its EBIT by 326% last year, which is an impressive improvement. If maintained that growth will make the debt even more manageable in the years ahead. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Seadrill can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

債務僅爲息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的0.047倍,息稅前利潤覆蓋利息高達16.1倍,很明顯,Seadrill並不是一個絕望的借款人。事實上,相對於其收益,其債務負擔似乎輕如鴻毛。更好的是,Seadrill去年的息稅前利潤增長了326%,這是一個令人印象深刻的改善。如果這種增長得以維持,將使未來幾年的債務更加易於管理。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定Seadrill能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last two years, Seadrill reported free cash flow worth 19% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.

最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們總是檢查息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的兩年中,Seadrill公佈的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的19%,確實很低。這種低迷的現金轉換水平削弱了其管理和償還債務的能力。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Seadrill's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But truth be told we feel its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow does undermine this impression a bit. Looking at the bigger picture, we think Seadrill's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Seadrill, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

令人高興的是,Seadrill令人印象深刻的利息保障意味着它在債務上佔了上風。但說實話,我們認爲它將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流確實稍微破壞了這種印象。從大局來看,我們認爲Seadrill使用債務似乎相當合理,我們對此並不擔心。畢竟,合理的槓桿可以提高股本回報率。隨着時間的推移,股價往往會跟隨每股收益,因此,如果你對Seadrill感興趣,你很可能想點擊這裏查看其每股收益歷史的交互式圖表。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果你有興趣投資能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增加利潤的企業,請查看這份資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業的免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論