share_log

Individual Investors Are Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.'s (SGX:NO4) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by S$68m Last Week

Individual Investors Are Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.'s (SGX:NO4) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by S$68m Last Week

個人投資者是 Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.s(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:NO4)最大的所有者在上週市值上漲6800萬新元后獲得了回報
Simply Wall St ·  05/28 06:13

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Dyna-Mac Holdings' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 55% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • Dyna-Mac Holdings擁有大量個人投資者所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 55% 的業務由前 2 名股東持有
  • 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SGX:NO4), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 32% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:NO4),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有32%所有權的個人投資者。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As a result, individual investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 19% gain.

因此,個人投資者是上週19%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Dyna-Mac Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Dyna-Mac Holdings的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:NO4 Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
新加坡交易所:NO4 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dyna-Mac Holdings?

關於Dyna-Mac控股公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Since institutions own only a small portion of Dyna-Mac Holdings, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

由於機構僅擁有Dyna-Mac Holdings的一小部分股份,因此許多機構可能沒有花太多時間考慮該股。但很明顯,有些人有;他們很喜歡它,足以買進。如果該公司正在增加收益,那可能表明它才剛剛開始引起這些財力雄厚的投資者的注意。當一些大型機構想同時購買某隻股票時,我們有時會看到股價上漲。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的歷史可能有助於考慮是否會有更多的機構投資者想要這隻股票。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:NO4 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
新加坡證券交易所:第四季度收益和收入增長 2024年5月27日

Dyna-Mac Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Estate of Lim Tze Jong, with ownership of 32%. Hanwha Ocean Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 23% of common stock, and Boon Hwee Teo holds about 6.1% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Ah Cheng Lim, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

Dyna-Mac Holdings不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是林子鐘的遺產,所有權爲32%。韓華海洋株式會社是第二大股東,擁有23%的普通股,Boon Hwee Teo持有該公司約6.1%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官阿成林以其名義分配了1.1%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細的研究表明,有兩位大股東通過其55%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Dyna-Mac Holdings

Dyna-Mac Holdings 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just S$429m, and insiders have S$34m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd的股份。它的市值僅爲4.29億新元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3400萬新元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司32%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 32%, of the Dyna-Mac Holdings stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

私人公司似乎擁有Dyna-Mac Holdings股票的32%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 27% of Dyna-Mac Holdings. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我們看來,上市公司擁有Dyna-Mac控股公司27%的股份。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論