share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Ardelyx, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ARDX) Recent US$276m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Ardelyx, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ARDX) Recent US$276m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

機構投資者可能會忽略Ardelyx, Inc.”s(納斯達克股票代碼:ARDX)由於長期收益保持樂觀,最近市值下降了2.76億美元
Simply Wall St ·  05/27 23:13

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Ardelyx implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 24 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構在Ardelyx的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 共有24位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,擁有50%的所有權
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

Every investor in Ardelyx, Inc. (NASDAQ:ARDX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 61% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Ardelyx, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ARDX)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構擁有61%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 15% last week. However, the 106% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

投資虧損是任何股東都不喜歡的事情,更不用說上週持股價值下降15%的機構投資者了。但是,106%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,他們應該注意將來的進一步損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ardelyx, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Ardelyx的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:ARDX Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車:ARDX 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ardelyx?

關於Ardelyx,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Ardelyx already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ardelyx's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Ardelyx已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Ardelyx的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:ARDX Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:ARDX 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 27 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ardelyx. Our data shows that Janus Henderson Group plc is the largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.0% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Michael Raab, the CEO has 0.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在Ardelyx的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,駿利亨德森集團是最大股東,已發行股份佔9.4%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約7.3%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有6.0%的所有權。此外,我們發現首席執行官邁克爾·拉布將0.6%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 24 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前24名股東的合併所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個單一股東擁有多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Ardelyx

Ardelyx 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Ardelyx, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$39m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Ardelyx, Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值3900萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 36% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司36%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Ardelyx that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Ardelyx的3個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論