share_log

TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) Institutional Investors Lost 9.4% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) Institutional Investors Lost 9.4% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

TAL教育集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:TAL)的機構投資者上週下跌9.4%,但受益於長期漲勢
Simply Wall St ·  05/27 19:37

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies TAL Education Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insider ownership in TAL Education Group is 31%
  • 高機構所有權意味着TAL Education Group的股價對其交易行爲敏感
  • 前11名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • TAL教育集團的內部所有權爲31%

A look at the shareholders of TAL Education Group (NYSE:TAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 41% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看TAL教育集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:TAL)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。機構擁有41%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 9.4% last week. However, the 95% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

投資虧損是任何股東都不喜歡的事情,更不用說上週持股價值下降9.4%的機構投資者了。但是,股東95%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TAL Education Group.

在下圖中,我們放大了TAL教育集團的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TAL Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
紐約證券交易所:TAL 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TAL Education Group?

關於TAL教育集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

TAL Education Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at TAL Education Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

TAL教育集團已經在股份登記處有機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看TAL教育集團的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TAL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
紐約證券交易所:TAL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 27 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in TAL Education Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Bangxin Zhang with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.2% and 3.0% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Yachao Liu is also Chief Operating Officer, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金在TAL教育集團的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官張邦新,其已發行股票的27%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約4.2%和3.0%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股東劉亞超再次擔任首席運營官,這表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前11位的合計擁有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of TAL Education Group

TAL 教育集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of TAL Education Group. Insiders own US$2.3b worth of shares in the US$7.3b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有TAL教育集團合理比例的股份。內部人士擁有這家價值73億美元的公司價值23億美元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司28%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論