share_log

With 82% Ownership of the Shares, DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE:DTM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 82% Ownership of the Shares, DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE:DTM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

DT Midstream, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:DTM)擁有 82% 的股份所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  05/27 19:25

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in DT Midstream implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 機構的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重大的影響。
  • 業務的51%由前15名股東持有。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

If you want to know who really controls DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE:DTM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想了解DT Midstream, Inc.(NYSE:DTM)的真正控制者,那麼您必須看看它的股權登記簿構成。我們可以看到,機構在公司中佔有大部分股份,擁有82%的所有權。換句話說,該組織的投資將獲得最多的收益(或損失)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DT Midstream, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解DT Midstream的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:DTM Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
NYSE:DTM所有權分解(2024年5月27日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DT Midstream?

機構所有權向我們展示了 DT Midstream 的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that DT Midstream does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DT Midstream's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到DT Midstream確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會搞錯。當多個機構持有股票時,總會存在一種'擁擠的交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個當事方可能會競相迅速賣出股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以看到DT Midstream的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住這個故事總有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:DTM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
NYSE:DTM營業收入和收入增長(2024年5月27日)

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in DT Midstream. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 11%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 4.0% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上股份,因此他們可以共同發揮重要的影響力。對於DT Midstream來說,對沖基金持股不多。公司的最大股東是黑巖公司,擁有11%的所有權。第二大股東是先鋒集團公司,持有普通股的10%,Dimensional基金顧問LP持有公司股票的約4.0%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

所有者們擁有Compass Diversified 33%的股份,其中主要由個人投資者組成,對Compass Diversified產生了一定的影響。雖然該所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益之下影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of DT Midstream

DT Midstream內部股權持有

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of DT Midstream, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$14m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有DT Midstream, Inc.的股份不到1%。請記住這是一個大公司,內部人士持有價值1400萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但可能值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DT Midstream. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

佔有18%股權的普通公衆投資者(主要由個人投資者組成),在DT Midstream中具有一定的影響力。儘管擁有相當大的所有權,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這並不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for DT Midstream that you should be aware of.

我覺得查看一個公司的股權結構非常有趣。但是要真正獲得深入的洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了DT Midstream的2個風險,您應該意識到這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論