share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Sable Offshore Corp. (NYSE:SOC) With 32% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Sable Offshore Corp. (NYSE:SOC) With 32% Ownership

機構投資者非常依賴擁有32%所有權的Sable Offshore Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SOC)
Simply Wall St ·  05/25 21:18

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Sable Offshore's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 高機構所有權意味着Sable Offshore的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 52% 的業務由前四名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近買了

A look at the shareholders of Sable Offshore Corp. (NYSE:SOC) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 32% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Sable Offshore Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SOC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有32%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Last week's 6.3% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 44% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週6.3%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,一年期股東回報率爲44%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sable Offshore.

在下圖中,我們放大了Sable Offshore的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SOC Ownership Breakdown May 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SOC 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sable Offshore?

關於Sable Offshore,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Sable Offshore does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sable Offshore, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Sable Offshore確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Sable Offshore過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SOC Earnings and Revenue Growth May 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SOC 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 25 日

It would appear that 19% of Sable Offshore shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. With a 17% stake, CEO James Flores is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 13%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

看來Sable Offshore有19%的股票由對沖基金控制。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。首席執行官詹姆斯·弗洛雷斯持有17%的股份,是最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的15%和13%。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步來看,我們發現前四名股東持有52%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Sable Offshore

Sable 離岸公司的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Sable Offshore Corp.. Insiders own US$234m worth of shares in the US$804m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Sable Offshore Corp的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家價值8.04億美元的公司價值2.34億美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sable Offshore. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有20%所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Sable Offshore有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Sable Offshore better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Sable Offshore you should be aware of, and 3 of them can't be ignored.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解Sable Offshore,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的4個Sable Offshore警告信號,其中3個不容忽視。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論