share_log

With 63% Ownership, Graham Holdings Company (NYSE:GHC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 63% Ownership, Graham Holdings Company (NYSE:GHC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

格雷厄姆控股公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:GHC)擁有63%的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/25 21:27

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Graham Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構持有Graham Holdings的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有7名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲52%
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Graham Holdings Company (NYSE:GHC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 63% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了格雷厄姆控股公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:GHC),了解業務的所有權結構很重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲63%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Graham Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關格雷厄姆控股的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:GHC Ownership Breakdown May 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GHC 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Graham Holdings?

關於格雷厄姆控股公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Graham Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Graham Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者持有格雷厄姆控股公司的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看格雷厄姆控股公司的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:GHC Earnings and Revenue Growth May 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GHC收益和收入增長 2024年5月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Graham Holdings. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Donald Graham with 13% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 8.4% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Timothy O'Shaughnessy directly holds 6.1% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對格雷厄姆控股公司進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是唐納德·格雷厄姆,已發行股份的13%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有10%的普通股,Vanguard Group, Inc.持有該公司約8.4%的股份。此外,該公司首席執行官蒂莫西·奧肖尼西直接持有已發行股份總額的6.1%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前7名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Graham Holdings

格雷厄姆控股公司的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Graham Holdings Company. It has a market capitalization of just US$3.3b, and insiders have US$759m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有格雷厄姆控股公司的大量股份。它的市值僅爲33億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值7.59億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Graham Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有格雷厄姆控股公司14%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Graham Holdings (at least 1 which is concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Graham Holdings發現了3個警告信號(至少有1個令人擔憂),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論