share_log

With 72% Institutional Ownership, Old Republic International Corporation (NYSE:ORI) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 72% Institutional Ownership, Old Republic International Corporation (NYSE:ORI) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

Old Republic International Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:ORI)擁有72%的機構所有權,是大公司中的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  05/25 02:50

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Old Republic International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着舊共和國國際的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 51% 的業務由前 12 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

Every investor in Old Republic International Corporation (NYSE:ORI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 72% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

舊共和國國際公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:ORI)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構擁有72%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Old Republic International.

在下圖中,我們放大了舊共和國國際的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ORI Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ORI 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Old Republic International?

關於舊共和國國際,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Old Republic International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Old Republic International, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

舊共和國國際已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下舊共和國國際過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ORI Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ORI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 24 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Old Republic International. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對舊共和國國際進行有意義的投資。貝萊德公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約11%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有7.3%的所有權。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到51%的所有權由前12名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Old Republic International

舊共和國國際的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that Old Republic International Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$54m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,舊共和國國際公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值5400萬美元的股票。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Old Republic International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有20%所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對舊共和國國際有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Old Republic International better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Old Republic International is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解舊共和國國際,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,Old Republic International在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論