share_log

Aflac Incorporated (NYSE:AFL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 69%

Aflac Incorporated (NYSE:AFL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 69%

Aflac Incorporated(紐約證券交易所代碼:AFL)是持有69%的機構投資者的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  05/24 22:59

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Aflac implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 25 shareholders own 48% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在Aflac的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前25名股東擁有公司48%的股份
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Aflac Incorporated (NYSE:AFL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 69% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了Aflac Incorporated(紐約證券交易所代碼:AFL),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲69%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Aflac.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Aflac的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AFL Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:AFL 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Aflac?

關於Aflac,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Aflac already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Aflac's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Aflac已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Aflac的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AFL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:AFL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 24 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Aflac. The company's largest shareholder is Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd., Asset Management Arm, with ownership of 9.2%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.1% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.2% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Daniel Amos, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Aflac進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是日本郵政控股有限公司的資產管理部門,所有權爲9.2%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有9.1%的普通股,貝萊德公司持有該公司約7.2%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官丹尼爾·阿莫斯將0.5%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Aflac

Aflac 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Aflac Incorporated. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$406m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有Aflac Incorporated不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們預計內部人士不會擁有很大一部分股票。他們共擁有4.06億美元的股票。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司30%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Aflac (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經發現了Aflac的2個警告信號(至少有1個讓我們有點不舒服),了解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論