share_log

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (NYSE:HPE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 85% of the Company

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (NYSE:HPE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 85% of the Company

惠普企業公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:HPE)受到持有公司85%股份的機構所有者的青睞
Simply Wall St ·  05/24 02:34

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Hewlett Packard Enterprise's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着惠普企業的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 51% 的業務由前 17 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

If you want to know who really controls Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (NYSE:HPE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着惠普企業公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:HPE),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲85%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關惠普企業的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:HPE Ownership Breakdown May 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:HPE 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 23 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hewlett Packard Enterprise?

關於惠普企業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Hewlett Packard Enterprise does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hewlett Packard Enterprise's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,惠普企業確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看惠普企業的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:HPE Earnings and Revenue Growth May 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:HPE 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 23 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.3% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.2% of the company stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在惠普企業的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有9.3%的普通股,道富環球顧問公司持有該公司約5.2%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前17名股東擁有該公司51%的總所有權,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Hewlett Packard Enterprise

惠普企業的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$90m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,惠普企業內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值9000萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hewlett Packard Enterprise. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有15%所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對惠普有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Hewlett Packard Enterprise , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向慧與科技確定了三個警告信號,了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論