share_log

With 82% Ownership in Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 82% Ownership in Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

擁有獨立銀行公司(納斯達克股票代碼:INDB)82%的所有權,機構投資者在很大程度上依賴該業務
Simply Wall St ·  05/24 00:44

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Independent Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持股顯著高,意味着美國獨立銀行的股價對機構交易行爲敏感。
  • 10個投資者擁有該公司51%的股權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解美國獨立銀行公司(納斯達克:INDB)真正的控制者,了解企業的所有權結構非常重要。機構持有公司82%的股份,這意味着該團體將在股票上漲時獲得最大的利益(或在經濟衰退時損失最大)。

Last week's 3.6% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 21%.

上週上漲3.6%,這意味着即使公司長期表現強勁,機構投資者仍然處於積極的狀態。 上週的漲幅將進一步提高股東的一年回報,目前爲21%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Independent Bank.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對美國獨立銀行的影響。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:INDB Ownership Breakdown May 23rd 2024
NasdaqGS:INDB股權分佈2024年5月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?

機構持股告訴我們有關美國獨立銀行的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Independent Bank already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Independent Bank's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

股東名單中已經有機構了。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者對該公司有一定認可度。但我們不能僅靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在 '排擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會爭相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面查看美國獨立銀行的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事往往更加複雜。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:INDB Earnings and Revenue Growth May 23rd 2024
NasdaqGS:INDB收益和收入增長2024年5月23日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Independent Bank is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 15% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的股份,因此他們一起可能強烈地影響董事會的決策。美國獨立銀行未被對沖基金控制。看看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是持有15%流通股的BlackRock,Inc.。持有12%和5.4%流通股的第二和第三大股東分別是The Vanguard Group,Inc.和State Street Global Advisors,Inc.。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank

美國獨立銀行的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Independent Bank Corp. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$20m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人員以自己的名義擁有的美國獨立銀行公司的股份不到1%。這是一家大公司,因此即使小比例的利益也可能在董事會和股東之間產生共識。在這種情況下,內部人員擁有價值2000萬美元的股票。能看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但值得檢查的是,這些內部人員是否一直在購買股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Independent Bank. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有美國獨立銀行17%的股份。雖然此組合不能必然掌控公司,但它確實可以對公司的經營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Independent Bank has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同團體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險爲例——美國獨立銀行有1個警告標誌,我們認爲您應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論