share_log

With 86% Institutional Ownership, Black Hills Corporation (NYSE:BKH) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 86% Institutional Ownership, Black Hills Corporation (NYSE:BKH) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

黑山公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BKH)擁有86%的機構所有權,是大公司中的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  05/23 19:32

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Black Hills' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 極高的機構持股比意味着黑山能源公司的股價對他們的交易行動很敏感。
  • 前13大股東擁有公司的51%股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Black Hills Corporation (NYSE:BKH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 86% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解黑山能源公司(紐交所:BKH)真正的控制者是誰,了解公司的所有權結構是很重要的。目前擁有公司最多股份的是機構,佔公司股份的86%。換句話說,機構投資者從公司的投資中可以獲得(或者失去)最多的利益。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Black Hills.

讓我們更仔細地觀察黑山能源公司的不同類型股東,以了解更多信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BKH Ownership Breakdown May 23rd 2024
紐交所:BKH股權結構分析(2024年5月23日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Black Hills?

機構持股告訴我們黑山能源公司的一些信息。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Black Hills already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Black Hills' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

黑山能源公司已經有機構投資者持有其股份。的確,機構投資者擁有公司的相當一部分股權。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過於依賴於機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也有失誤的時候。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價猛跌。因此,值得注意的是,更重要的是關注公司的未來。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BKH Earnings and Revenue Growth May 23rd 2024
紐交所:BKH收入和營收增長情況(2024年5月23日)

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Black Hills is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 5.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際持有公司的股份超過了一半,因此它們可以集體行使重要的權力。黑山能源公司不是由對沖基金持有的。我們的數據顯示,黑巖集團是公司最大的股東,持有15%的流通股份,第二和第三大股東分別爲先鋒集團和道富銀行,持有公司的12%和5.6%的流通股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊上看,13大股東控制了51%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有這一股權的大多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Black Hills

黑山能源公司內部股權情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that Black Hills Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$21m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,黑山能源公司內部人員擁有不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員可能在公司擁有實質性利益的同時,擁有的比例不高。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約爲2100萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員擁有股份是好事,但值得檢查的是那些內部人員是否一直在買入股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有公司的13%股權,因此不能被輕易忽略。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們有利時推動政策決策,但他們仍可以共同影響公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Black Hills has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about.

雖然考慮公司持股的不同集團是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險爲例,黑山能源公司的存在兩個警告信號(其中一個令人擔憂),我們認爲你應該了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論