share_log

Individual Investors Invested in Seatrium Limited (SGX:5E2) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's S$819m Market Cap Decline

Individual Investors Invested in Seatrium Limited (SGX:5E2) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's S$819m Market Cap Decline

投資Seatrium Limited(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:5E2)的個人投資者在上週市值下降8.19億新元中首當其衝
Simply Wall St ·  05/22 08:09

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Seatrium by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Institutions own 11% of Seatrium
  • 個人投資者對Seatrium的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 共有25名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲48%
  • 機構擁有 Seatrium 11% 的股份

If you want to know who really controls Seatrium Limited (SGX:5E2), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 51% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Seatrium Limited(新加坡證券交易所:5E2),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。個人投資者持有 51% 的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 13% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌13%之後,個人投資者遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Seatrium.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Seatrium的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:5E2 Ownership Breakdown May 22nd 2024
新加坡交易所:5E2 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Seatrium?

關於Seatrium,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Seatrium. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Seatrium's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在Seatrium中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Seatrium的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:5E2 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 22nd 2024
新加坡證券交易所:5E2 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 22 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Seatrium. Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 36% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.3% and 2.0% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Seatrium進行有意義的投資。淡馬錫控股(私人)有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的36%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約2.3%和2.0%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Seatrium

Seatrium 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that Seatrium Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around S$1.6m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,Seatrium Limited內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在不擁有太多比例權益的情況下擁有該公司的有意義的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約160萬新元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 51% of Seatrium shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有Seatrium51%的股份。這種所有權水平賦予了廣大公衆的投資者一定的權力,可以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 36% stake in Seatrium. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有Seatrium36%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論