share_log

With 3.4% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Option Care Health, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPCH) 3.4% Stock Price Decline

With 3.4% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Option Care Health, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPCH) 3.4% Stock Price Decline

凭借3.4%的一年期回报率,机构所有者可能会忽略Option Care Health, Inc.s(纳斯达克股票代码:OPCH)股价下跌3.4%
Simply Wall St ·  05/21 23:24

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Option Care Health's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Option Care Health的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 50% 的业务由前 20 名股东持有
  • 内部人士最近一直在买入

A look at the shareholders of Option Care Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPCH) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Option Care Health, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:OPCH)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为59%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.4% in value last week. Still, the 3.4% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

没有股东喜欢在投资中蒙受损失,尤其是上周持股价值下降3.4%的机构投资者。尽管如此,3.4%的一年期涨幅可能有助于减轻他们的总体亏损。但是,我们假设他们将来会注意弱点。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Option Care Health.

在下图中,我们放大了Option Care Health的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:OPCH Ownership Breakdown May 21st 2024
纳斯达克GS:OPCH 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Option Care Health?

关于期权医疗健康,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Option Care Health. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Option Care Health, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者在Option Care Health中拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看Option Care Health过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OPCH Earnings and Revenue Growth May 21st 2024
纳斯达克GS:OPCH 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 21 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Option Care Health. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 3.1% of the stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Option Care Health进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大股东,已发行股份的12%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约11%和3.1%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 20 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前20位的公司合并所有权为50%,这表明没有一个股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Option Care Health

期权医疗健康的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that Option Care Health, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$32m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的信息表明,Option Care Health, Inc.内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值3200万美元的股票。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司40%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Option Care Health (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经确定了Option Care Health的3个警告信号(至少有1个有点不愉快),了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发