share_log

AeroVironment, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AVAV) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.3% Over the Past Week

AeroVironment, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AVAV) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.3% Over the Past Week

AeroEvironment, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:AVAV)隨着股票繼續給人留下深刻印象,過去一週上漲了5.3%,大型機構所有者必須感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  05/21 18:49

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies AeroVironment's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着AeroVironment的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有10位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,擁有52%的所有權
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

If you want to know who really controls AeroVironment, Inc. (NASDAQ:AVAV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着AeroVironment, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:AVAV),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲86%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$276m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 80% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

在上週該公司的市值上漲了2.76億美元之後,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。目前,一年的投資回報率爲80%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AeroVironment.

在下圖中,我們放大了AeroVironment的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:AVAV Ownership Breakdown May 21st 2024
納斯達克GS:AVAV 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AeroVironment?

關於AeroVironment,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that AeroVironment does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see AeroVironment's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,AeroVironment確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到AeroVironment的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:AVAV Earnings and Revenue Growth May 21st 2024
納斯達克GS:AVAV收益和收入增長 2024年5月21日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in AeroVironment. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 5.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對AeroVironment進行有意義的投資。貝萊德公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的17%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和State Street Global Advisors, Inc.分別擁有11%和5.8%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前十名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of AeroVironment

AeroVironment 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in AeroVironment, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$59m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有AeroVironment, Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值5900萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AeroVironment. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

AeroVironment擁有13%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對AeroVironment有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for AeroVironment you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了兩個你應該知道的AeroVironment警告標誌。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論