share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) With 87% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) With 87% Ownership

機構投資者在很大程度上依賴亞瑟·加拉格爾律師事務所(NYSE: AJG) 擁有 87% 的所有權
Simply Wall St ·  05/14 01:22

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Arthur J. Gallagher's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,亞瑟·加拉格爾的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 51% 的業務由前 15 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

Every investor in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 的每位投資者紐約證券交易所代碼:AJG)應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構擁有87%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$55b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 16% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,在該公司的市值達到550億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。目前,一年股東回報率爲16%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Arthur J. Gallagher.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Arthur J. Gallagher的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AJG Ownership Breakdown May 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:AJG 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arthur J. Gallagher?

關於亞瑟·加拉格爾,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Arthur J. Gallagher already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Arthur J. Gallagher's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

亞瑟·加拉格爾已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看亞瑟·加拉格爾的收入記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AJG Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:AJG收益和收入增長 2024年5月13日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Arthur J. Gallagher. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.0% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 6.9% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對亞瑟·加拉格爾進行有意義的投資。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有8.0%的普通股,資本研究與管理公司持有該公司約6.9%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前15位的公司合併所有權爲51%,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Arthur J. Gallagher

亞瑟·加拉格爾的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Insiders own US$658m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有亞瑟·加拉格爾公司的部分股份。內部人士擁有價值6.58億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益非常一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Arthur J. Gallagher. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有12%所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對亞瑟·加拉格爾有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Arthur J. Gallagher that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了亞瑟·加拉格爾的3個警告信號,在投資之前,你應該注意這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論