share_log

With 89% Ownership in Hubbell Incorporated (NYSE:HUBB), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 89% Ownership in Hubbell Incorporated (NYSE:HUBB), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

擁有哈貝爾公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:HUBB)89%的所有權,機構投資者在很大程度上依賴該業務
Simply Wall St ·  05/13 21:32

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Hubbell implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 機構對Hubbell的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 13 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的購買

Every investor in Hubbell Incorporated (NYSE:HUBB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 89% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

哈貝爾公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:HUBB)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲89%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$1.0b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 51% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

在上週該公司的市值上漲了10億美元之後,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。目前,一年的投資回報率爲51%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hubbell, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Hubbell的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:HUBB Ownership Breakdown May 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:HUBB 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hubbell?

關於Hubbell,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Hubbell does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hubbell's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Hubbell確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Hubbell的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:HUBB Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:HUBB 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 13 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hubbell. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 4.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and FMR LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Hubbell進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。貝萊德公司和FMR LLC分別擁有7.4%和4.6%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前13名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Hubbell

Hubbell的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Hubbell Incorporated insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$77m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息表明,哈貝爾公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值7700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Hubbell. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Hubbell10%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Hubbell , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Hubbell確定了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論