share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ:BWMN) With 42% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ:BWMN) With 42% Ownership

機構投資者對擁有42%所有權的鮑曼諮詢集團有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:BWMN)大加讚賞
Simply Wall St ·  05/13 19:28

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Bowman Consulting Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着鮑曼諮詢集團的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前15名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

A look at the shareholders of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ:BWMN) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看鮑曼諮詢集團有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:BWMN)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲42%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$562m in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 14% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週,在該公司的市值達到5.62億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。目前,一年的投資回報率爲14%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Bowman Consulting Group.

在下圖中,我們放大了鮑曼諮詢集團的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:BWMN Ownership Breakdown May 13th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:BWMN 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bowman Consulting Group?

關於鮑曼諮詢集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Bowman Consulting Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Bowman Consulting Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

鮑曼諮詢集團已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看鮑曼諮詢集團的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:BWMN Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:BWMN 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 13 日

Bowman Consulting Group is not owned by hedge funds. With a 13% stake, CEO Gary Bowman is the largest shareholder. With 11% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, FMR LLC and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

鮑曼諮詢集團不歸對沖基金所有。首席執行官加里·鮑曼持有13%的股份,是最大股東。FMR LLC和貝萊德公司分別擁有11%和3.9%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前15位的公司合併所有權爲50%,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Bowman Consulting Group

鮑曼諮詢集團的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.. Insiders have a US$107m stake in this US$562m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

看來內部人士擁有鮑曼諮詢集團有限公司的很大一部分股份。業內人士在這筆5.62億美元的業務中持有1.07億美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 39% stake in Bowman Consulting Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有鮑曼諮詢集團39%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Bowman Consulting Group you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了鮑曼諮詢集團的兩個警告信號,你應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論