share_log

Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 76% of the Company

Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 76% of the Company

Raymond James Financial, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:RJF)主要由擁有公司 76% 股份的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  05/13 19:10

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Raymond James Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 各機構持有雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前9名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:RJF),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有76%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Raymond James Financial.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:RJF Ownership Breakdown May 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:RJF 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Raymond James Financial?

關於雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Raymond James Financial. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Raymond James Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:RJF Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:RJF 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 13 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Raymond James Financial. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.3% and 7.9% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股東,已發行股份爲11%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.3%和7.9%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Raymond James Financial

雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Raymond James Financial, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$2.6b. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融公司的股份。內部人士持有價值26億美元的大量股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Raymond James Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融擁有13%的所有權,公衆對雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融有一定程度的影響力,主要是個人投資者。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Raymond James Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Raymond James Financial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融找到了一個警告信號,我們知道它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論