share_log

We Think Exponent's (NASDAQ:EXPO) Healthy Earnings Might Be Conservative

We Think Exponent's (NASDAQ:EXPO) Healthy Earnings Might Be Conservative

我们认为Exponent(纳斯达克股票代码:EXPO)的健康收益可能是保守的
Simply Wall St ·  05/11 20:10

Shareholders appeared to be happy with Exponent, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:EXPO) solid earnings report last week. According to our analysis of the report, the strong headline profit numbers are supported by strong earnings fundamentals.

股东们似乎对Exponent, Inc.感到满意。”s(纳斯达克股票代码:EXPO)上周的收益报告稳健。根据我们对报告的分析,强劲的总体利润数字得到了强劲的收益基本面的支持。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:EXPO Earnings and Revenue History May 11th 2024
纳斯达克GS: 世博会收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 5 月 11 日

Zooming In On Exponent's Earnings

放大 Exponent 的收益

One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

用于衡量公司将其利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的情况的一个关键财务比率是应计比率。简而言之,该比率从净利润中减去FCF,然后将该数字除以该时期公司的平均运营资产。该比率向我们显示了公司的利润超过其FCF的程度。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.

因此,负应计比率对公司来说是正数,而正应计比率是负数。虽然应计比率高于零并不令人担忧,但我们确实认为,当公司的应计比率相对较高时,值得注意。这是因为一些学术研究表明,高应计率往往会导致利润下降或利润增长减弱。

Over the twelve months to March 2024, Exponent recorded an accrual ratio of -0.15. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. In fact, it had free cash flow of US$132m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of US$101.4m. Exponent shareholders are no doubt pleased that free cash flow improved over the last twelve months.

在截至2024年3月的十二个月中,Exponent的应计比率为-0.15。因此,其法定收入大大低于其自由现金流。实际上,它去年的自由现金流为1.32亿美元,远远超过其1.014亿美元的法定利润。毫无疑问,指数股东对过去十二个月自由现金流的改善感到高兴。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让你想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看根据他们的估计描绘未来盈利能力的交互式图表。

Our Take On Exponent's Profit Performance

我们对Exponent盈利表现的看法

As we discussed above, Exponent has perfectly satisfactory free cash flow relative to profit. Because of this, we think Exponent's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! And the EPS is up 19% annually, over the last three years. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. If you'd like to know more about Exponent as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. While conducting our analysis, we found that Exponent has 1 warning sign and it would be unwise to ignore it.

正如我们上面讨论的那样,Exponent的自由现金流相对于利润来说非常令人满意。因此,我们认为Exponent的盈利潜力至少和看起来一样好,甚至可能更好!在过去三年中,每股收益每年增长19%。本文的目标是评估我们在多大程度上可以依靠法定收益来反映公司的潜力,但还有很多需要考虑的地方。如果您想进一步了解Exponent作为一家企业,请务必了解其面临的任何风险。在进行分析时,我们发现 Exponent 有 1 个警告信号,因此忽略它是不明智的。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Exponent's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

本报告仅研究了揭示Exponent利润性质的单一因素。但是,还有很多其他方法可以让你对公司的看法。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率是有利的商业经济的标志,而另一些人则喜欢 “关注资金”,寻找内部人士正在买入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到这份免费收藏的拥有高股本回报率的公司,或者这份内部人士正在购买的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发