share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:SCRM) With 82% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:SCRM) With 82% Ownership

機構投資者對擁有82%所有權的Screaming Eagle收購公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SCRM)深感信心
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 23:14

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Screaming Eagle Acquisition's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高機構所有權意味着 Screaming Eagle Acquisition 的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有9名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有52%的所有權
  • 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解

If you want to know who really controls Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:SCRM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp.(納斯達克股票代碼:SCRM),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲82%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Last week's 17% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 14%.

上週17%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。上週的漲勢將進一步提振目前爲14%的股東一年回報率。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Screaming Eagle Acquisition.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Screaming Eagle收購的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:SCRM Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車:SCRM 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Screaming Eagle Acquisition?

關於收購 Screaming Eagle,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Screaming Eagle Acquisition. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Screaming Eagle Acquisition, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者在《尖鷹收購》中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看收購Screaming Eagle過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:SCRM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車:SCRM 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 10 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 7.8% of Screaming Eagle Acquisition. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Eagle Equity Partners, LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.8% and 6.5% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有 Screaming Eagle 收購的 7.8% 的股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。Eagle Equity Partners, LLC目前是最大股東,已發行20%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.8%和6.5%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前9名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Screaming Eagle Acquisition

收購 Screaming Eagle 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們的數據無法證實董事會成員親自持有股份。鑑於我們沒有獲得內部所有權,我們可能缺少數據。因此,在這裏評估首席執行官的薪酬和任期會很有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Screaming Eagle Acquisition. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有《尖鷹收購》10%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Screaming Eagle Acquisition better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Screaming Eagle Acquisition is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地理解 Screaming Eagle 的收購,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,Screaming Eagle的收購顯示了兩個警告信號,你應該知道...

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論