share_log

NLIGHT, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LASR) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 16% Gain Last Week

NLIGHT, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LASR) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 16% Gain Last Week

NLIGHT, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:LASR)機構股東度過了愉快的一週,一年期回報率在上週上漲了16%之後有所增加
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 19:14

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, nLIGHT's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,nLight的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 52% 的業務由前 11 名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of nLIGHT, Inc. (NASDAQ:LASR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 84% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了nLight, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LASR),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲84%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Last week's 16% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 9.8% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週16%的漲幅意味着儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,一年的投資回報率爲9.8%,上週的漲幅本來會非常受歡迎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of nLIGHT.

在下圖中,我們放大了 nLight 的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:LASR Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
納斯達克GS:LASR 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About nLIGHT?

關於nLight,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in nLIGHT. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at nLIGHT's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在nLight中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看nLight的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:LASR Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
納斯達克GS:LASR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 10 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. nLIGHT is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 7.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and JP Morgan Asset Management are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Scott Keeney directly holds 2.8% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加起來可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。nLight不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大的股東,已發行股份的11%。貝萊德公司和摩根大通資產管理公司分別擁有7.4%和7.2%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司首席執行官斯科特·基尼直接持有已發行股份總額的2.8%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 52% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前11名股東的合併所有權爲52%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of nLIGHT

nLight 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in nLIGHT, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$26m worth of the US$611m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有nLight, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值6.11億美元的公司價值2600萬美元。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over nLIGHT. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

nLight擁有11%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對nLight有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with nLIGHT .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該注意我們在nLight中發現的兩個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論