share_log

After Losing 4.8% in the Past Year, Churchill Downs Incorporated (NASDAQ:CHDN) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 4.8% in the Past Year, Churchill Downs Incorporated (NASDAQ:CHDN) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

丘吉爾唐斯公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CHDN)在過去一年中下跌了4.8%之後,最近的漲勢必須讓機構所有者鬆一口氣
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 00:35

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Churchill Downs implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 機構持有丘吉爾唐斯的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 前9名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 內部人士最近的購買

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Churchill Downs Incorporated (NASDAQ:CHDN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了丘吉爾唐斯公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CHDN),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲79%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 7.1% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 4.8%.

機構投資者將對上週股價上漲7.1%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的虧損總額爲4.8%,令人失望。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Churchill Downs.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於丘吉爾唐斯的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CHDN Ownership Breakdown May 9th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CHDN 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Churchill Downs?

關於丘吉爾唐斯,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Churchill Downs does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Churchill Downs, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,丘吉爾唐斯確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看丘吉爾唐斯過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CHDN Earnings and Revenue Growth May 9th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CHDN 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 9 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Churchill Downs. Our data shows that Capital Research and Management Company is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. With 9.2% and 8.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO William Carstanjen is the owner of 2.0% of the company's shares.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在丘吉爾唐斯的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,資本研究與管理公司是最大股東,已發行股份的13%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和貝萊德公司分別擁有9.2%和8.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,首席執行官威廉·卡斯坦詹是該公司2.0%股份的所有者。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前9名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Churchill Downs

丘吉爾唐斯的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Churchill Downs Incorporated. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$361m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有丘吉爾唐斯公司的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共擁有價值3.61億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會對他們是買入還是賣出感興趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Churchill Downs. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

丘吉爾唐斯擁有12%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆在一定程度上對丘吉爾唐斯有影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.7%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司5.7%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Churchill Downs (1 is a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經確定了丘吉爾唐斯的 2 個警告標誌(1 個有點不愉快),你應該注意這些標誌。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論