share_log

Harley-Davidson, Inc.'s (NYSE:HOG) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 3.2% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy

Harley-Davidson, Inc.'s (NYSE:HOG) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 3.2% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy

哈雷戴維森公司。”s(紐約證券交易所代碼:HOG)一年期回報率在上週上漲3.2%後攀升,機構投資者一定很高興
Simply Wall St ·  05/09 23:36

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Harley-Davidson's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 高機構所有權意味着哈雷戴維森的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前8名股東擁有公司52%的股份
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Harley-Davidson, Inc. (NYSE:HOG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 80% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了哈雷戴維森公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:HOG),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有80%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$4.8b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 5.9% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,在該公司的市值達到48億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。目前,一年股東回報率爲5.9%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Harley-Davidson.

在下圖中,我們放大了哈雷戴維森的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:HOG Ownership Breakdown May 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:HOG 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Harley-Davidson?

關於哈雷戴維森,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Harley-Davidson does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Harley-Davidson, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,哈雷戴維森確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看哈雷戴維森過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:HOG Earnings and Revenue Growth May 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:HOG收益和收入增長 2024年5月9日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 8.8% of Harley-Davidson shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.6% of shares outstanding. With 8.8% and 8.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, H Partners Management, LLC and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Jochen Zeitz is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。看來對沖基金擁有哈雷戴維森8.8%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲9.6%。H Partners Management, LLC和貝萊德公司分別擁有8.8%和8.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,首席執行官約亨·蔡茨持有該公司0.6%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了進一步的挖掘,發現8位大股東約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,因此在某種程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Harley-Davidson

哈雷戴維森的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Harley-Davidson, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$43m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有哈雷戴維森公司不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在不擁有太多比例權益的情況下擁有該公司的有意義的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約4300萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Harley-Davidson. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有11%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對哈雷戴維森有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Harley-Davidson has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例-哈雷戴維森有兩個警告信號(其中一個很重要),我們認爲你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論