share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LZ) Latest 24% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LZ) Latest 24% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

在LegalZoom.com公司之後,機構投資者可能會採取嚴厲措施。”s(納斯達克股票代碼:LZ)最近24%的跌幅增加了一年的虧損
Simply Wall St ·  05/09 19:26

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in LegalZoom.com implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在LegalZoom.com的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有9名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有51%的所有權
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

If you want to know who really controls LegalZoom.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:LZ), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着LegalZoom.com公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LZ),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有54%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 24% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 11% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell LegalZoom.com which might hurt individual investors.

上週該公司的股價下跌了24%之後,機構投資者遭受的損失最大。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這使股東一年的虧損增加了11%。也被稱爲 “智能貨幣”,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售LegalZoom.com,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about LegalZoom.com.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於LegalZoom.com的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:LZ Ownership Breakdown May 9th 2024
NASDAQGS: LZ 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LegalZoom.com?

關於LegalZoom.com,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in LegalZoom.com. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at LegalZoom.com's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者在LegalZoom.com中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看LegalZoom.com的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:LZ Earnings and Revenue Growth May 9th 2024
納斯達克GS: LZ 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 9 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in LegalZoom.com. Francisco Partners Management, L.P. is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對LegalZoom.com進行有意義的投資。弗朗西斯科合夥人管理有限責任公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的15%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約8.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有8.4%的所有權。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步挖掘發現,9名大股東約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of LegalZoom.com

LegalZoom.com 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in LegalZoom.com, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$47m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有LegalZoom.com公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值4700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 29% stake in LegalZoom.com. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有LegalZoom.com29%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論