share_log

With 85% Ownership of the Shares, Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 85% Ownership of the Shares, Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

Marvell Technology, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MRVL)擁有 85% 的所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  05/06 21:57

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Marvell Technology's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着 Marvell Technology 的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 50% 的業務由前 12 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

A look at the shareholders of Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 85% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Marvell科技公司(納斯達克股票代碼:MRVL)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲85%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Marvell Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Marvell Technology的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:MRVL Ownership Breakdown May 6th 2024
納斯達克GS:MRVL 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marvell Technology?

機構所有權告訴我們關於 Marvell 技術的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Marvell Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Marvell Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Marvell Technology確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Marvell Technology的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:MRVL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 6th 2024
納斯達克GS:MRVL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 6 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Marvell Technology is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 15%. With 8.4% and 7.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。Marvell Technology 不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是FMR LLC,所有權爲15%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和貝萊德公司分別擁有8.4%和7.0%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前12名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Marvell Technology, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$331m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有Marvell科技公司不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們預計內部人士不會擁有很大一部分股票。他們共擁有3.31億美元的股票。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Marvell Technology .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在 Marvell Technology 中發現的 1 個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論