share_log

Institutional Investors Control 82% of Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 8.1%

Institutional Investors Control 82% of Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 8.1%

机构投资者控制了伍德沃德公司(纳斯达克股票代码:WWD)82%的股份,并在股票上涨8.1%后于上周获得了回报
Simply Wall St ·  05/01 23:16

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Woodward implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 14 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构在伍德沃德的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响
  • 前14名股东拥有公司51%的股份
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了伍德沃德公司(纳斯达克股票代码:WWD),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有82%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Last week's 8.1% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 44% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周8.1%的涨幅意味着,尽管该公司表现出强劲的长期趋势,但机构投资者仍处于积极的一端。目前,一年期股东回报率为44%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Woodward.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于伍德沃德的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:WWD Ownership Breakdown May 1st 2024
NASDAQGS: WWD 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Woodward?

关于伍德沃德,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Woodward. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Woodward's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在伍德沃德拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到伍德沃德的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:WWD Earnings and Revenue Growth May 1st 2024
NASDAQGS: WWD 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 1 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Woodward is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. With 9.5% and 7.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。伍德沃德不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大股东,已发行股份的10%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和资本研究与管理公司分别拥有9.5%和7.2%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前14位的公司合并所有权为51%,这表明没有一个股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Woodward

伍德沃德的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that Woodward, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$80m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,伍德沃德公司内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有该公司的很大一部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共拥有价值8000万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。您可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Woodward. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有伍德沃德17%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Woodward better, we need to consider many other factors.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解伍德沃德,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问这张过去的收益、收入和现金流的交互式图表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发