share_log

Positive Week for China Pacific Insurance (Group) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601601) Institutional Investors Who Lost 12% Over the Past Year

Positive Week for China Pacific Insurance (Group) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601601) Institutional Investors Who Lost 12% Over the Past Year

在過去一年中損失了12%的中國太平洋保險(集團)股份有限公司(SHSE: 601601)機構投資者本週表現良好
Simply Wall St ·  04/30 14:11

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in China Pacific Insurance (Group) implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構在中國太平洋保險(集團)的大量持股意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有8名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls China Pacific Insurance (Group) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601601), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 33% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了中國太平洋保險(集團)股份有限公司(SHSE: 601601),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有33%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 9.0% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 12%.

機構投資者將對上週股價上漲9.0%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的虧損總額達到令人失望的12%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of China Pacific Insurance (Group).

在下圖中,我們放大了中國太平洋保險(集團)的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:601601 Ownership Breakdown April 30th 2024
SHSE: 601601 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 30 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Pacific Insurance (Group)?

關於中國太平洋保險(集團),機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

China Pacific Insurance (Group) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Pacific Insurance (Group)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

中國太平洋保險(集團)已經在股份登記處設有機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到中國太平洋保險(集團)的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:601601 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 30th 2024
SHSE: 601601 2024 年 4 月 30 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in China Pacific Insurance (Group). The company's largest shareholder is Shenergy (Group) Company Limited, with ownership of 14%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 8.3% of the stock.

對沖基金在中國太平洋保險(集團)的股份不多。該公司的最大股東是申能源(集團)有限公司,所有權爲14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約13%和8.3%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現大股東中有8人約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of China Pacific Insurance (Group)

中國太平洋保險(集團)的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of China Pacific Insurance (Group) Co., Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own CN¥12m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有的中國太平洋保險(集團)股份有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,我們確實注意到,內部人士有可能通過私營公司或其他公司結構獲得間接利益。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值1200萬元人民幣的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 13%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司擁有13%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 25%, of the China Pacific Insurance (Group) stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎擁有中國太平洋保險(集團)25%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand China Pacific Insurance (Group) better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for China Pacific Insurance (Group) you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解中國太平洋保險(集團),我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了中國太平洋保險(集團)的一個警告信號,你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論