share_log

With 74% Ownership of the Shares, W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE:GWW) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 74% Ownership of the Shares, W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE:GWW) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

W.W. Grainger, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:GWW)擁有 74% 的股份所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  04/29 20:16

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, W.W. Grainger's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 16 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,W.W. Grainger的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前16名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

Every investor in W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE:GWW) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 74% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

W.W. Grainger, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:GWW)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲74%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about W.W. Grainger.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於W.W. Grainger的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:GWW Ownership Breakdown April 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GWW 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About W.W. Grainger?

關於 W.W. Grainger,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in W.W. Grainger. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of W.W. Grainger, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者持有W.W. Grainger的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下W.W. Grainger過去的收益軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:GWW Earnings and Revenue Growth April 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GWW 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 29 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in W.W. Grainger. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. With 9.0% and 8.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Susan Williams and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對W.W. Grainger進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已發行股份爲11%。蘇珊·威廉姆斯和貝萊德公司分別擁有9.0%和8.1%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前16位的公司合併所有權爲51%,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of W.W. Grainger

W.W. Grainger 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in W.W. Grainger, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$4.2b. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有W.W. Grainger, Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值42億美元的大量股份。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益非常一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in W.W. Grainger. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有W.W. Grainger17%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand W.W. Grainger better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that W.W. Grainger is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地理解 W.W. Grainger,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,W.W. Grainger 在我們的投資分析中顯示了 1 個警告信號,你應該知道...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論