share_log

Olin Corporation (NYSE:OLN) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company

Olin Corporation (NYSE:OLN) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company

奧林公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:OLN)受到持有公司89%股份的機構所有者的青睞
Simply Wall St ·  04/29 18:33

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Olin implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構對奧林的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 共有9名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有51%的所有權
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

If you want to know who really controls Olin Corporation (NYSE:OLN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 89% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着奧林公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:OLN),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲89%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Olin.

在下圖中,我們放大了奧林的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:OLN Ownership Breakdown April 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:OLN 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Olin?

關於奧林,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Olin does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Olin's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,奧林確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看奧林的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:OLN Earnings and Revenue Growth April 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:OLN收益和收入增長 2024年4月29日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Olin. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.8% and 8.3% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。對沖基金在奧林的股票不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已發行股份的10%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.8%和8.3%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Olin

奧林的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Olin Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$31m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有奧林公司不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在不擁有太多比例權益的情況下擁有該公司的有意義的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約3100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司10%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Olin better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Olin that you should be aware of before investing here.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解奧林,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了奧林的3個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,你應該注意這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論