Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,290.70
    +24.75 (+0.76%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,229.11
    +155.13 (+0.41%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,963.68
    +425.87 (+2.30%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,440.56
    +59.21 (+0.71%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,221.62
    -806.74 (-1.30%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,266.65
    -91.36 (-6.55%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,214.54
    +0.46 (+0.01%)
     
  • Dow

    39,429.74
    +41.98 (+0.11%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,315.06
    -31.20 (-0.19%)
     
  • Gold

    2,370.80
    +30.50 (+1.30%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    79.19
    -0.07 (-0.09%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.5000
    +0.0510 (+1.15%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,600.67
    -0.55 (-0.03%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,088.79
    -34.81 (-0.49%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,511.93
    -30.53 (-0.47%)
     

Recent uptick might appease JD.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:JD) institutional owners after losing 13% over the past year

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, JD.com's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • The top 25 shareholders own 42% of the company

  • 11% of JD.com is held by insiders

A look at the shareholders of JD.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:JD) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 40% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Institutional investors would appreciate the 19% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 13%.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about JD.com.

View our latest analysis for JD.com

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About JD.com?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

JD.com already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of JD.com, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

JD.com is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Qiangdong Liu (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 11% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.4% and 3.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of JD.com

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in JD.com, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$46b, and insiders have US$5.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 9.4% of the JD.com shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that JD.com is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.