share_log

Here's Why Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

Here's Why Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

這就是Gogo(納斯達克股票代碼:GOGO)的債務負擔沉重的原因
Simply Wall St ·  04/26 21:40

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Gogo Inc. (NASDAQ:GOGO) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。”當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。我們可以看到,Gogo Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:GOGO)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?

When Is Debt A Problem?

債務何時會成爲問題?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

當企業無法通過自由現金流或以誘人的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會變得有風險。資本主義的重要組成部分是 “創造性破壞” 過程,在這種過程中,倒閉的企業被銀行家無情地清算。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東才能控制債務。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地很好地管理債務,而且有利於自己的利益。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,要做的第一件事就是綜合考慮其現金和債務。

What Is Gogo's Debt?

Gogo的債務是什麼?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Gogo had debt of US$594.8m at the end of December 2023, a reduction from US$697.4m over a year. However, it does have US$162.3m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$432.5m.

您可以點擊下圖以獲取更多詳細信息,該圖片顯示,截至2023年12月底,Gogo的債務爲5.948億美元,較去年同期的6.974億美元有所減少。但是,它確實有1.623億美元的現金抵消了這一點,淨負債約爲4.325億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:GOGO Debt to Equity History April 26th 2024
NASDAQGS: GOGO債券與股本的比率歷史記錄 2024年4月26日

How Strong Is Gogo's Balance Sheet?

Gogo的資產負債表有多強?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Gogo had liabilities of US$72.0m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$668.8m due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$162.3m and US$73.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$505.1m.

根據上次報告的資產負債表,Gogo在12個月內到期的負債爲7,200萬美元,12個月以後到期的負債爲6.688億美元。另一方面,它有1.623億美元的現金和價值7,340萬美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額5.051億美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because Gogo is worth US$1.13b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

這種赤字還不錯,因爲Gogo的價值爲11.3億美元,因此,如果需要,可能會籌集足夠的資金來支撐其資產負債表。但很明顯,我們一定要仔細研究它能否在不稀釋的情況下管理債務。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。這樣,我們既考慮債務的絕對數量,也考慮爲債務支付的利率。

Gogo has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.1 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 4.8 times. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Unfortunately, Gogo's EBIT flopped 13% over the last four quarters. If that sort of decline is not arrested, then the managing its debt will be harder than selling broccoli flavoured ice-cream for a premium. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Gogo can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Gogo的債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率爲3.1,其息稅前利潤覆蓋了利息支出的4.8倍。這表明,儘管債務水平很高,但我們不會稱其爲有問題。不幸的是,Gogo的息稅前利潤在過去四個季度中下降了13%。如果這種下降得不到遏制,那麼管理債務將比以溢價出售西蘭花味的冰淇淋更難。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定Gogo能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. In the last three years, Gogo's free cash flow amounted to 43% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們顯然需要研究息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,Gogo的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的43%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不好。

Our View

我們的觀點

We'd go so far as to say Gogo's EBIT growth rate was disappointing. But at least its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is not so bad. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Gogo stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Gogo .

我們甚至可以說Gogo的息稅前利潤增長率令人失望。但至少它將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流還不錯。從資產負債表來看,考慮到所有這些因素,我們確實認爲債務使Gogo的股票有點風險。有些人喜歡這種風險,但我們注意到了潛在的陷阱,因此我們可能更希望它承擔較少的債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。爲此,你應該注意我們在Gogo中發現的3個警告信號。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,通常最好將注意力集中在沒有淨負債的公司身上。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長記錄)。它是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論