share_log

Great Week for Agenus Inc. (NASDAQ:AGEN) Institutional Investors After Losing 72% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Agenus Inc. (NASDAQ:AGEN) Institutional Investors After Losing 72% Over the Previous Year

繼去年下跌72%之後,Agenus Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:AGEN)機構投資者迎來了美好的一週
Simply Wall St ·  04/26 20:05

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Agenus' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 19 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 高機構所有權意味着Agenus的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前19名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 內部人士最近買了

Every investor in Agenus Inc. (NASDAQ:AGEN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Agenus Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:AGEN)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲45%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 67% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 72%.

機構投資者將對上週股價上漲67%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的虧損總額達到令人失望的72%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Agenus, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Agenus的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:AGEN Ownership Breakdown April 26th 2024
納斯達克CM:Agen所有權明細 2024年4月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Agenus?

關於Agenus,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Agenus already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Agenus' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Agenus已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Agenus的收入記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:AGEN Earnings and Revenue Growth April 26th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:AGEN收益和收入增長 2024年4月26日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.7% of Agenus. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 7.7%. With 7.6% and 7.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Deep Track Capital, LP and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Garo Armen directly holds 0.6% of the total shares outstanding.

我們的數據表明,對沖基金擁有Agenus6.7%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,所有權爲7.7%。Deep Track Capital、LP和The Vanguard Group, Inc.分別佔已發行股票的7.6%和7.2%,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司首席執行官加羅·阿門直接持有已發行股份總額的0.6%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前19位的合計持有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Agenus

Agenus 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Agenus Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$2.1m worth of the US$174m company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有Agenus Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值1.74億美元的公司價值210萬美元。這至少顯示出一定的一致性,但我們通常希望看到更多的內部持股。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Agenus. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有40%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Agenus有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 7.6% stake in Agenus. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有Agenus7.6%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 5 warning signs with Agenus (at least 2 which are a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經在Agenus上發現了5個警告信號(至少有2個有點不愉快),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論