share_log

Institutional Investors of Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRA) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 14% Drop

Institutional Investors of Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRA) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 14% Drop

在上週下跌14%之後,Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:NMRA)的機構投資者一定會感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  04/26 18:43

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Neumora Therapeutics' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Neumora Therapeutics的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 52% 的業務由前四名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 33% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:NMRA),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有33%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

And following last week's 14% decline in share price, institutional suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌14%之後,該機構遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Neumora Therapeutics.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Neumora Therapeutics的信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:NMRA Ownership Breakdown April 26th 2024
納斯達克GS:NMRA 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Neumora Therapeutics?

關於Neumora Therapeutics,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Neumora Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Neumora Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Neumora Therapeutics確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Neumora Therapeutics過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:NMRA Earnings and Revenue Growth April 26th 2024
納斯達克GS:NMRA 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 26 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Neumora Therapeutics. Our data shows that Amgen Inc. is the largest shareholder with 22% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 20% and 4.9% of the stock.

對沖基金在Neumora Therapeutics中持有的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,安進公司是最大股東,已發行股份的22%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約20%和4.9%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即該公司約有52%的股份由前四名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Neumora Therapeutics

Neumora Therapeutics 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$85m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值8500萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Neumora Therapeutics. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有19%所有權的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Neumora Therapeutics有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 20%, private equity firms could influence the Neumora Therapeutics board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有20%的股份,可能會影響Neumora Therapeutics的董事會。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 22% of the Neumora Therapeutics shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有Neumora Therapeutics已發行股票的22%。很難肯定地說,但這表明它們將商業利益交織在一起。這可能是一個戰略利害關係,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變動。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Neumora Therapeutics is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those are significant...

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,Neumora Therapeutics在我們的投資分析中顯示了4個警告信號,其中2個信號很重要...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論