share_log

Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688127) CEO Yunming Xu, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 5.3% Reduction in Holdings Value

Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688127) CEO Yunming Xu, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 5.3% Reduction in Holdings Value

公司最大股東浙江藍特光學股份有限公司(SHSE: 688127)首席執行官徐雲明預計持股價值下降5.3%
Simply Wall St ·  04/26 07:19

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Zhejiang Lante Optics implies vested interests in company growth
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 對浙江藍特光學的重大內部控制意味着公司增長的既得利益
  • 51% 的業務由前 2 名股東持有
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

If you want to know who really controls Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688127), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 57% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着浙江藍特光學股份有限公司(SHSE: 688127),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。個人內部人士持有57%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And following last week's 5.3% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌5.3%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zhejiang Lante Optics.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於浙江藍特光學的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688127 Ownership Breakdown April 25th 2024
SHSE: 688127 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Lante Optics?

關於浙江藍特光學,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Zhejiang Lante Optics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Zhejiang Lante Optics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,浙江藍特光學確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看浙江藍特光學過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688127 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 25th 2024
SHSE: 688127 2024 年 4 月 25 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zhejiang Lante Optics. With a 38% stake, CEO Yunming Xu is the largest shareholder. Fangli Wang is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Jiaxing Lantuo Equity Investment Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) holds about 2.1% of the company stock.

對沖基金在浙江藍特光學的股份不多。首席執行官徐雲明持有38%的股份,是最大股東。王芳麗是第二大股東,擁有14%的普通股,嘉興藍拓股權投資合夥企業(有限合夥)持有公司約2.1%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前兩名股東通過其51%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Lante Optics

浙江藍特光學的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥4.3b stake in this CN¥7.6b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

內部人士似乎擁有浙江藍特光學有限公司一半以上的股票。這賦予了他們很大的力量。這意味着內部人士在這項76億元的業務中擁有43億元人民幣的非常有價值的股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否在出售他們的任何股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in Zhejiang Lante Optics. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有浙江藍特光學34%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Zhejiang Lante Optics is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,浙江藍特光學在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論