share_log

Following a 4.1% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Flowers Foods, Inc. (NYSE:FLO) Institutional Owners

Following a 4.1% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Flowers Foods, Inc. (NYSE:FLO) Institutional Owners

繼去年下降4.1%之後,最近的漲勢可能會令Flowers Foods, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:FLO)機構所有者感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  04/26 02:53

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Flowers Foods implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構對Flowers Foods的大量持股意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有14名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有50%的所有權
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

If you want to know who really controls Flowers Foods, Inc. (NYSE:FLO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Flowers Foods, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:FLO),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有69%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

After a year of 4.1% losses, last week's 7.3% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

在經歷了4.1%的虧損之後,上週7.3%的漲幅將受到機構投資者的歡迎,這可能表明回報率可能開始呈上升趨勢。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Flowers Foods.

在下圖中,我們放大了Flowers Foods的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FLO Ownership Breakdown April 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FLO 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Flowers Foods?

關於鮮花食品,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Flowers Foods. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Flowers Foods' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有Flowers Foods的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Flowers Foods的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FLO Earnings and Revenue Growth April 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FLO收益和收入增長 2024年4月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Flowers Foods. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.5%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.6% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO A. McMullian is the owner of 1.3% of the company's shares.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。對沖基金在Flowers Foods的股票不多。該公司的最大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有權爲9.5%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約8.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.6%的所有權。此外,首席執行官麥克穆利安持有該公司1.3%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前14名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Flowers Foods

鮮花食品的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Flowers Foods, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$390m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有Flowers Foods, Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值3.9億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Flowers Foods. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Flowers Foods23%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Flowers Foods is showing 5 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,Flowers Foods在我們的投資分析中顯示了5個警告信號,你應該知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論