share_log

With 80% Ownership, The Clorox Company (NYSE:CLX) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 80% Ownership, The Clorox Company (NYSE:CLX) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

高樂氏公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CLX)擁有80%的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  04/25 01:19

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Clorox's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,高樂氏的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 23 名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

Every investor in The Clorox Company (NYSE:CLX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 80% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

高樂氏公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CLX)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構擁有80%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Clorox.

在下圖中,我們放大了Clorox的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CLX Ownership Breakdown April 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CLX 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Clorox?

關於Clorox,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Clorox does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Clorox, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,高樂氏確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Clorox過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CLX Earnings and Revenue Growth April 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CLX 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 24 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Clorox. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在高樂氏的股票不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約8.2%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有6.8%的所有權。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 23 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前23名股東的合併所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個單一股東擁有多數股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Clorox

Clorox 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that The Clorox Company insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$31m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,高樂氏公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們預計內部人士不會擁有很大一部分股票。他們共擁有3100萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Clorox. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Clorox19%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Clorox .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在Clorox身上發現的4個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論