share_log

MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 82% of the Company

MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 82% of the Company

MSA Safety Incorporated(紐約證券交易所代碼:MSA)主要由擁有公司82%股份的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  04/24 22:36

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, MSA Safety's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,MSA Safety的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 52% 的業務由前 9 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

If you want to know who really controls MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着MSA Safety Incorporated(紐約證券交易所代碼:MSA),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲82%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MSA Safety.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關MSA安全的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MSA Ownership Breakdown April 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:MSA 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MSA Safety?

關於MSA安全,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in MSA Safety. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see MSA Safety's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在MSA Safety中擁有相當多的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到MSA Safety的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MSA Earnings and Revenue Growth April 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:MSA 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 24 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in MSA Safety. Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在MSA Safety中持有的股票不多。養老金基金ABP目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲11%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約9.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有8.1%的所有權。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了更多挖掘,發現9位最大股東約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of MSA Safety

MSA Safety 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in MSA Safety Incorporated. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$470m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有MSA安全公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值4.7億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over MSA Safety. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有11%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對MSA Safety有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MSA Safety better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for MSA Safety (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解MSA安全,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如風險。每家公司都有,我們發現了 4 個 MSA 安全的警告信號(其中 1 個很重要!)你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論