share_log

With 52% Ownership of the Shares, On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 52% Ownership of the Shares, On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

On Holding AG(紐約證券交易所代碼:ONON)擁有52%的股票所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  04/23 21:59

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies On Holding's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • 29% of On Holding is held by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着On Holding的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前十名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • On Holding 29% 的股份由內部人士持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了On Holding AG(紐約證券交易所代碼:ONON),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有52%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of On Holding, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究On Holding的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ONON Ownership Breakdown April 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:ONON 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 23 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About On Holding?

機構所有權在持有時告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in On Holding. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see On Holding's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在On Holding中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到On Holding的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ONON Earnings and Revenue Growth April 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:ONON 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 23 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in On Holding. FMR LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.9% of shares outstanding. With 6.2% and 5.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Chl Investment Fund Ltd and Olivier Bernhard are the second and third largest shareholders. Olivier Bernhard, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. In addition, we found that Martin Hoffmann, the CEO has 1.4% of the shares allocated to their name.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對On Holding進行有意義的投資。FMR LLC目前是最大股東,已發行股份的8.9%。Chl投資基金有限公司和奧利維爾·伯恩哈德分別擁有6.2%和5.8%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第三大股東奧利維爾·伯恩哈德也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。此外,我們發現首席執行官馬丁·霍夫曼將1.4%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前十名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of On Holding

On Holding 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in On Holding AG. Insiders own US$2.9b worth of shares in the US$10b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有On Holding AG的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家價值100億美元的公司價值29億美元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over On Holding. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有13%的所有權的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對On Holding有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 6.2%, of the On Holding stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎擁有On Holding股票的6.2%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論