Donald Trump Could Still Win Even If He Loses In Supreme Court Over Presidential Immunity Claim
Donald Trump Could Still Win Even If He Loses In Supreme Court Over Presidential Immunity Claim
Former President Donald Trump could see a strategic victory in his Supreme Court case, even if the court dismisses his claim regarding presidential immunity.
前總統唐納德·特朗普可能會在最高法院的案件中取得戰略勝利，即使法院駁回了他關於總統豁免的主張。
The case, set for a high-profile showdown, revolves around whether criminal charges against Trump for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results can be dismissed on the grounds of broad presidential immunity.
該案將進行一場備受矚目的攤牌，圍繞能否以廣泛的總統豁免權爲由駁回對特朗普企圖推翻2020年大選結果的刑事指控展開。
Despite the possibility of the Supreme Court rejecting Trump's broad immunity argument, the case could still be redirected to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan for further examination.
儘管最高法院有可能駁回特朗普的廣泛豁免權論點，但該案仍可能轉交給美國地方法院法官Tanya Chutkan進行進一步審查。
This redirection could delve into whether some of Trump's actions are shielded from prosecution, introducing further delays and potentially affecting the timing of the trial, initially scheduled for March.
這種重定向可能會深入探討特朗普的某些行爲是否可以免受起訴，從而導致進一步的延誤，並可能影響原定於3月進行的審判的時機。
Attorney Richard Bernstein, who opposes Trump's immunity claim and filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of former governement officials, told NBC that even a complex factual test for immunity requiring the case to be remanded would align with Trump's preferences by potentially ensnaring the case in procedural delays.
律師理查德·伯恩斯坦反對特朗普的豁免主張，並代表前政府官員提交了法庭之友摘要。他告訴美國全國廣播公司，即使是要求將案件發回重審的複雜事實檢驗，也可能使該案陷入程序延誤，從而符合特朗普的偏好。
Also Read: Courtroom Appearances By These Two Members Of Donald Trump's Family Could Help Him In Hush-Money Trial, Say Experts
另請閱讀：專家稱，唐納德·特朗普家族的這兩名成員在法庭上出庭可以幫助他進行Hush-Money審判
At the heart of the Washington case, which is distinct from Trump's ongoing criminal trial in New York, is the former president's involvement in submitting false election certificates to Congress — a scheme aiming to annul President Joe Biden's victory. This led to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack by Trump supporters.
華盛頓案與特朗普正在紐約進行的刑事審判截然不同，其核心是前總統參與向國會提交虛假選舉證書——該計劃旨在廢除喬·拜登總統的勝利。這導致了特朗普支持者1月6日對國會大廈的襲擊。
Special Counsel Jack Smith, leading the prosecution, has asserted that these actions constituted multiple crimes, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and obstruction of an official proceeding.
領導起訴的特別顧問傑克·史密斯斷言，這些行爲構成了多項犯罪，包括串謀欺詐美國和阻礙官方訴訟。
The Supreme Court's engagement with the case thus far hints at a reluctance to issue a broad ruling against Trump. Instead, it might recognize certain presidential acts that warrant immunity, leaving the finer details to trial courts. This nuanced approach suggests that the justices are seeking to articulate a more refined stance on presidential immunity that acknowledges potential protections in some instances.
迄今爲止，最高法院對該案的處理表明，他們不願對特朗普做出廣泛的裁決。相反，它可能會承認某些值得豁免的總統法案，將更精細的細節留給初審法院。這種細緻入微的方法表明，法官們正在尋求就總統豁免權問題闡明更完善的立場，承認在某些情況下可能的保護。
The potential for a remand raises questions about the procedural timeline. Trump's legal team could possibly face a pretrial process examining the protected nature of his official acts. This situation could lead to substantial delays, further complicating the path of the case towards a trial.
還押的可能性引發了人們對程序時間表的質疑。特朗普的法律團隊可能面臨審前程序，審查其官方行爲的受保護性質。這種情況可能導致嚴重的拖延，使該案的審判道路進一步複雜化。
Now Read: Donald Trump's PAC Doesn't Have Much More Cash Left In Its Tank To Cover His Legal Bills
立即閱讀：唐納德·特朗普的PAC沒有更多的現金來支付他的法律賬單
Photo: Shutterstock
照片：Shutterstock
This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
該內容部分是在人工智能工具的幫助下製作的，並由Benzinga編輯審查和發佈。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。