share_log

Institutional Investors in Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Lost 3.6% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Lost 3.6% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

艾默生電氣公司的機構投資者紐約證券交易所代碼:EMR)上週下跌3.6%,但受益於長期增長
Simply Wall St ·  04/21 22:28

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Emerson Electric's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 44% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構所有權居高不下意味着艾默生電氣的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前25名股東擁有公司44%的股份
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

If you want to know who really controls Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 76% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了艾默生電氣公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:EMR),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有76%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$62b last week. However, the 30% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

上週該公司的市值跌至620億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。但是,30%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Emerson Electric, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究艾默生電氣的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:EMR Ownership Breakdown April 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:EMR 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Emerson Electric?

關於艾默生電氣,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Emerson Electric does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Emerson Electric's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,艾默生電氣確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看艾默生電氣的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:EMR Earnings and Revenue Growth April 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:EMR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 21 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Emerson Electric. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.1%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.5% and 4.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在艾默生電氣的股份不多。該公司的最大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有權爲9.1%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.5%和4.3%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Emerson Electric

艾默生電氣的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Emerson Electric Co. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$233m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,艾默生電氣公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值2.33億美元的股票。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in Emerson Electric. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有艾默生電氣24%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Emerson Electric you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了一個你應該知道的艾默生電氣警告標誌。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論