share_log

Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 74% of the Company

Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 74% of the Company

林肯國家公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:LNC)主要由擁有公司74%股份的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  04/21 21:08

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lincoln National's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,林肯國民的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 51% 的業務由前 21 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近買了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了林肯國家公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:LNC),了解企業的所有權結構非常重要。機構擁有74%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lincoln National.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於林肯國民銀行的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LNC Ownership Breakdown April 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:LNC 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lincoln National?

關於林肯國民大學,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Lincoln National does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lincoln National's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,林肯國民銀行確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看林肯國民的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LNC Earnings and Revenue Growth April 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:LNC收益和收入增長 2024年4月21日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lincoln National. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. With 9.6% and 3.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對林肯國民銀行進行有意義的投資。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的13%。貝萊德公司和道富環球顧問公司分別擁有9.6%和3.8%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 21 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記處,我們可以看到,51%的所有權由前21名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Lincoln National

林肯國家集團的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lincoln National Corporation. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$34m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有林肯國家公司不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值3400萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lincoln National. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有25%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對林肯國民銀行有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Lincoln National , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向林肯國民銀行確定了一個警告信號,我們知道它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論