share_log

Private Equity Firms Are LoanDepot, Inc.'s (NYSE:LDI) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$55m

Private Equity Firms Are LoanDepot, Inc.'s (NYSE:LDI) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$55m

私募股權公司是 LoanDepot, Inc.s(紐約證券交易所代碼:LDI)最大的所有者在市值下降5500萬美元后受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  04/18 22:45

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over loanDepot by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • PCP Managers, L.P. owns 56% of the company
  • Institutions own 12% of loanDepot
  • 私募股權公司對LoanDepot的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • PCP Managers, L.P. 擁有該公司 56% 的股份
  • 機構擁有 LoanDepot 12% 的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of loanDepot, Inc. (NYSE:LDI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private equity firms with 56% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了LoanDepot, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:LDI),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有56%所有權的私募股權公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And last week, private equity firms endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 12%.

上週,私募股權公司遭受了最大的損失,股價下跌了12%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of loanDepot.

在下圖中,我們放大了LoanDepot的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LDI Ownership Breakdown April 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LDI 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 18 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About loanDepot?

關於LoanDepot,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that loanDepot does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at loanDepot's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,LoanDepot確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看LoanDepot的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LDI Earnings and Revenue Growth April 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LDI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 18 日

loanDepot is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is PCP Managers, L.P. with 56% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 3.4% and 2.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Jeffrey DerGurahian and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Jeffrey DerGurahian, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Investment Officer.

LoanDepot不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是PCP Managers, L.P.,其已發行股份的56%。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權益控制權。傑弗裏·德古拉希安和先鋒集團公司分別擁有3.4%和2.4%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第二大股東傑弗裏·德古拉希安也恰好擁有首席投資官的頭銜。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of loanDepot

LoanDepot 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in loanDepot, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$762m, and insiders have US$73m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有LoanDepot, Inc.的股份。它的市值僅爲7.62億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值7300萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over loanDepot. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

LoanDepot擁有23%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對LoanDepot有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 56% stake in loanDepot. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有LoanDepot56%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with loanDepot , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向LoanDepot確定了1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論