share_log

Accenture Plc's (NYSE:ACN) Institutional Investors Lost 3.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Accenture Plc's (NYSE:ACN) Institutional Investors Lost 3.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

埃森哲集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:ACN)的機構投資者上週下跌了3.0%,但受益於長期漲勢
Simply Wall St ·  04/18 19:06

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Accenture implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持有埃森哲的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 共有25名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲45%
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

A look at the shareholders of Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 78% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看埃森哲集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:ACN)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲78%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$197b last week. Still, the 14% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週該公司的市值跌至1970億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。儘管如此,14%的一年期漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體虧損。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Accenture.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於埃森哲的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ACN Ownership Breakdown April 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ACN 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 18 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Accenture?

關於埃森哲,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Accenture does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Accenture's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,埃森哲確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看埃森哲的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ACN Earnings and Revenue Growth April 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ACN收益和收入增長 2024年4月18日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Accenture. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.4% of shares outstanding. With 7.6% and 4.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。對沖基金在埃森哲的股份不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的9.4%。貝萊德公司和道富環球顧問公司分別擁有7.6%和4.2%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Accenture

埃森哲的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that Accenture plc insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$161m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,埃森哲公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值1.61億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司22%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Accenture better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解埃森哲,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論