share_log

Lemonade, Inc.'s (NYSE:LMND) Institutional Investors Lost 5.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Lemonade, Inc.'s (NYSE:LMND) Institutional Investors Lost 5.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Lemonade, Inc. 's(紐約證券交易所代碼:LMND)機構投資者上週下跌5.1%,但受益於長期漲勢
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 23:55

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lemonade implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 機構持有Lemonade的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有9名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有51%的所有權
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE:LMND), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了Lemonade, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:LMND),了解業務的所有權結構很重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有45%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.1b last week. However, the 23% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

上週該公司的市值跌至11億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。但是,23%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lemonade, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Lemonade的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LMND Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LMND 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lemonade?

關於檸檬水,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Lemonade does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lemonade's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Lemonade確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Lemonade的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LMND Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LMND 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 17 日

Lemonade is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Softbank Group Capital Limited is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

檸檬水不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,軟銀集團資本有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的17%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約7.4%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有6.5%的所有權。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Lemonade

檸檬水的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Lemonade, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$65m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有Lemonade, Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值6500萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lemonade. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有30%所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Lemonade有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 17%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司擁有17%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lemonade better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Lemonade that you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地理解檸檬水,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了兩個你應該注意的檸檬水警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論